Sunday, March 11, 2012

My favourite thrillers...PART 2

Welcome again to the second part of my favourite thrillers list. In addition to PART 1, there are several more thrillers that are worthy of your attention. So, lets get on with it, shall we? ....


google image
The Sixth Sense (1999)
Bruce Willis is Dr. Malcolm Crowe, a child psychologist, who at the start of the film we learn that he is shot by a young man who breaks into his house. The young man is actually a former patient of Dr. Crowe, whom he treated when he was a boy for having hallucinations. Then the film introduces Cole, a 9-year-old boy who has similar problems. Cole kept saying that he 'can see dead people walking like regular people', so he is always afraid and because of that he doesn't have any friends. Dr. Crowe of course thinks Cole is delusional but dedicated to stay close to him as he remembers his failure with his former patient. Meanwhile, Dr. Crowe is sometimes seen as having problems with his wife, as if they are uncommunicative due to his dedication to work. As the film progresses, Dr. Crowe finally knows that Cole has the ability to see ghosts (and perhaps his former patient too), and tries to convince Cole that there might be a reason the ghosts keep haunting him and so ask the boy to communicate with them. Cole follows his advice and in the end solving some mysteries that finally give peace to the wandering souls. Cole finally accepts his abilities as a gift and also be at peace with it. With this success, Dr. Crowe finally finds himself at home, looking at his wife sleeping. In his wife's grasp, there's a wedding ring. When he realizes that he's not wearing one, finally the cold truth comes to him. What's the truth? Ahh, you guys already know...but I'm saving it to those who haven't seen this movie. Kinda sad...actually. Although this one is ghostly-themed, it is not the same as other horror movies.  

google image
Trauma (2004)
Those outside Malaysia may not know this suspense-thriller, because this is the product of a Malaysian director, Aziz M. Osman. Nurul (Amy Mastura) is a traumatised woman who's trying to get a grip back to her normal life. The reason of her trauma is an accident in which she accidently hit a man while driving and the man died. Her husband (Azhar Sulaiman) and her younger sister (Sharifah Aleya) have been very supportive and help her a lot in her effort to make a comeback. However, things slowly changes when she hires Jeslina (Nasha Aziz) as her personal assistant in her office. Being utterly efficient, caring, honest and reliable, Jeslina gains Nurul's trust until one day Nurul invited her to stay temporarily at her house while she tries to find a place to stay. It seems that Jeslina isn't what she seems to be. Nurul starts to be haunted by the trauma of her past again, and due to certain events, her husband and sister is convinced that Nurul should be sent to the psychiatric award for medication. Little do they know that it's all the works of Jeslina. How does she do it? Who is Jeslina? What is the reason behind it all? Can Nurul prove that she is not insane and overcome her trauma? For me, this is a good thriller. Too bad there's not many of this kind nowadays (locally). 

google image
Blood Diamond (2006)
An adventure thriller, and some reviews also call it a political-thriller. The background of this story is based on true events of the unimaginably difficult situations in African countries such as Sierra Leone, where there's civil wars, humanity is foreign, people enslaved into diamond minings to satisfy the greediness of corrupted leaders and businessmen. Archer is a white Rhodesian diamond smuggler, arrested while trying to smuggle diamond, and Vandy is a Sierre Leone's fisherman, whom, after being captured by rebel armies, is enslaved as diamon miner (a bit lucky, since other captives are being maimed). Vandy found a valuable pink diamond and hid it for his own, however he's captured when the mine he works at are attacked by other army. In prison, the two persons meet and after a chain of events, they become acquainted and go through the adventure together. Archer wants the pink diamond that Vandy found. Vandy wants to find his family, especially his son, who is separated in the earlier army raid. While at it, they meet Maddy, a journalist and humanitarian, and through her, they manage to go to some places to achieve their goal. During the process, Archer and Vandy share a bond and we know that both of them are just victims of war. Archer assisted Vandy until Vandy is reunited with his family, retrieve the stone and leave the country, while Maddy continues the effort to reveal the bloody trade on the conflict diamonds until it reaches the court of law. There are both happy and sad ending, but in the end, it's the issue that matters. A good movie staying true to its main blood diamond topic, makes us realize what's happening to the other side of the world, and what blood diamond means...

google image
Shutter Island (2010)
A mind-boggling psycho-thriller indeed! I just didn't know which/whose story to believe right until the end. This movie is an adaptation from a novel of the same name (and the author also wrote the novel Mystic River, which is also turned into a film). U.S. Marshall Teddy Daniels (Leonardo DiCaprio) is sent to Shutter Island with his partner, Chuck (Mark Ruffalo), to conduct an investigation of a missing patient, Rachel Solando in a psychiatric facility there. Rachel is admitted there after drowning her own children. While investigating, Daniels feels that the director of the facility and some of the staff are not giving him a 100% cooperation. Furthermore, he is forbidden to enter one ward inside the facility. Daniels also have recurring dreams and visions about his late wife, who died in a fire in their apartment caused by an arsonist, and also about his past missions in Germany. He also suffers migrain attacks while in the facility. Somehow, after a sequence of events, he begins to set the course of his investigations into finding the arsonist after finding out that he is on the island. The 'real' Rachel Solando is formerly a psychiatrist in the facility but being held as a patient after she finds out that the facility is performing some kind of dangerous and illegal experiment to the patients. But, is this really true? Is Daniels really who he thinks he is?

google image
Inception (2010)
I watched this one two times in cinema. With that, it means great! And I have reviewed it here. An extract from my previous writing;

... Inception is about a group of thieves, and they steal ideas from the victims' mind inside their dreams. There are rules of sharing the same dreams, there are dreams within dreams and in due process of their mission, they must not lost their minds in the layers of dreams and they have to keep in check which is a dream and which is reality.
Each of the group members has a role in the mission. There's The Extractor, The Point-Man, The Architect, The Forger, The Chemist and The Tourist.. (..like Ocean's 11...anyway, this movie is about a heist anyway, albeit a different kind..). Usually, they steal the idea, but on this mission, they have to 'plant' an idea in someone's mind. That's what 'inception' means in this movie.
 
A brilliant story.
 
And so, that concludes my list. Perhaps there are more....but, at the moment, these are the ones that are close to my mind and memory. Hopefully, my friend will be able to enjoy it as much as I have. And to you guys....what are your favourite thrillers? :)
 

Friday, March 9, 2012

My favourite thrillers...PART 1

I have a request from a fellow friend, Iejan, to list out my favourite thrillers. Well, after listing my favourite Disney movie songs, I guess....why not for thrillers! So, (drumroll please...) I present to you my dear readers, my favourite thrillers, unsorted...

Ok, but before that, let me tell you what this list is all about. First, it is my personal favourite list. So, please do not compare it with other professional movie listers or top charts because it is not the same. Second, all the movies are the ones that I've watched before somewhere in my life, of course, I don't put  any movies that I haven't seen, right? Third, the list is unsorted in terms of least-most favourites, since I find it hard to put a certain kind of numerical value in it, I just love it! However, I still sort it but according to the year it was produced, ok. And fourth, by favourite, I mean, a thriller movie that is very thrilling, gluing me to my seat, then beaming on it and cannot forget about it after watching it, and the ones that give me some kind of satisfying or overwhelming (and still sane...) feeling afterwards. So, here's the list...

Rear Window (1954)
google image
I remembered borrowing this movie in VCD from my boss when I worked in a DVD/VCD shop many years ago, just because the director is Alfred Hitchcock. And it turned out a thrill as I expected. It tells about Jeff (James Stewart), a professional photographer who is confined in his apartment due to a broken leg. Having nothing to do, he spends his time watching his surroundings through his window. And that makes him becoming knowledgeable and attentive to his neighbours and their routines. One day he notices that a couple had an argument, and some time later he hasn't seen the wife anymore. He also notices that the husband picking up some sort of crates one evening plus other questionable things. As Jeff becomes suspicious, he continues to spy on this neighbour and began investigating with the help of some of his friends since the police cannot take any action without having evidence. So, can he finally be sure that a crime has been committed? Will he succeed in finding out the truth? The husband's innocence/guilt is only confirmed at the end of the movie.

google image
Misery (1990)
I have reviewed on this movie here. It is based on Stephen King's novel of the same name. Talking about the Master of Thrillers! Paul Sheldon is a famous novelist who, while on the way to send his latest manuscript to his agent, involves in an accident on a heavily-snowed road. He is rescued by a nurse, Annie Wilkes, who happens to be one of his fans. Although suffering massive injuries, he recovers little by little under the nursing of Annie, although still has a lot of difficulties to move. However, as time pass by, Paul feels that he is trapped in her home and it turns out that Annie is a really obsessive fan (and a psycho one too). Afterwards, Paul has to think of a plan on how to rescue himself from his manic rescuer.

google image
Se7en (1995)
Aww...Brad Pitt is still a budding handsome young star alongside the more experienced Morgan Freeman. And that is also how their characters are, one is a veteran cop and another a young detective, called to team up together to solve a series of cold-blooded and sick murder done by a sicko. This movie is where I first know about the Seven Deadly Sins, that is wrath, greed, sloth, pride, lust, envy and gluttony. The murderer chooses his victims according to the sins that they make
as shown by how he kills them and and how the body is found. The cops take on this seven deadly sins theory as they find each body and tries to capture him using this psychological profile (sort of  Criminal Minds lah kan..). This one is really psycho...and with a tragic end indeed.

google image
The Talented Mr. Ripley (1999)
Another brilliant story of a sick mind, I guess. Awesome too. This movie is an adaptation from a novel. Matt Damon is Tom Ripley, a normal man, perhaps an underachiever, who, in a sequence of events, finds himself trusted by a rich billionaire to go to Italy to find his son, Dickie (Jude Law) and convince him to return home. Now, Ripley, is a brilliant man, unfortunately, as we go along the story, we will learn that he is a master of impersonation, forgery and above all, a dishonest man. Scene by scene, we watch in horror and cringe in fear, although this is not a ghost story, to see Ripley plays his cards and turn all events to his advantage, gaining trust from Dickie and his girlfriend, Marge (Gwyneth Paltrow), just to maintain the wealthy lifestyle Dickie has provided him. When Dickie no longer interested in his continuous company, Ripley manages to spend one last time together on a boat trip that ends in a tragedy. Later on, Ripley takes on Dickie's identity but as he goes along, it is becoming more and more difficult for him to maintain that identity as he stumble upon Marge and other friends of Dickie. Will Ripley survive is acts? Or will he claim another victim? Uff, I hate Ripley more and more until the end of the movie.

google image
Fermat's Room (2007)
In Spanish, La Habitación de Fermat. I watched this movie on Astro by accident. It's a Spanish movie and of course dialogues in Spanish, but thanks to subtitles, I could enjoy this brilliant thriller. 3 mathematicians and an inventor received a mysterious invitation to a house on a quest to solve an enigma, a mind boggling game. But they have to use pseudonyms for communications based on famous historical mathematicians. So, they become Évariste Galois, Oliva Sabuco, David Hilbert, Blaise Pascal and the host himself uses Pierre de Fermat. When they are all at the house, they finally meet Fermat but shortly as when they start to discuss, Fermat received a call and has to leave. While that, the 4 people left in the room receive a message from a PDA that is left in the room. It is a puzzle and they have to solve it within one minute. They solved it but exceeded the 1-minute given, and they realized that the room shrinks a little bit. Then come more and more puzzle from the PDA, which they have to solve within the given time or else the room will further shrink and becoming smaller. During this, the story behind each people slowly unravelled and we can understand that each of them is linked in some way or he other. They later find out that Fermat is actually invited there too with specific instructions and thus wondering who is the real culprit. Are they all sent there as participants of a math game...or is there more sinister motive involve? Will they find the real culprit? What is the culprit's reason for trapping them there? What really happen to Fermat? Will they all die in the room?   

So, how's the list so far?

Alrighty, I don't want to write a very long post....so, see you in PART 2!

Geez, I'm dying to watch all these movies again!

Sunday, March 4, 2012

The Woman In Black

google image
I like thrillers. Especially action thrillers and psycho thrillers, but not ghostly horror thrillers. Be it Korean, Japanese, Thailand or Malaysian horror movies, it's just the same. Why? Because I won't be watching them good enough...as part of the scenes can only be seen between my fingers. I find it not beneficial to needlessly scare myself with gross images and aimlessly shocking my heart. A bad horror movie, to me, is the one laced with comedy, and those that is full with shocking elements without any solid story lines. 

So, I kinda regretted my decision to watch The Woman In Black without properly knowing that there's ghosts involved. However, I could still accept it (except some that were blocked with my fingers). There's a sensible story line, albeit a simple and direct one, actually, but digestible to the mind. Shocking elements? Not excessive, but good. The proof is the amount of screams by fellow viewers. So, lets go to the story...

I'd say that there are only one main character for the whole story. Arthur Kipps. Kipps is a young lawyer in the 19th century London, troubled and not having peace since the death of his wife while in childbirth. However, their baby survived and is now a cute and adorable 4 year old Joseph. One day, Kipps is assigned to manage an old manor called the Eel Marsh, remotely located on a small island in the marshes, near a village. However, since his arrival to the village, Kipps never receive a warm welcome from the villagers, except for Mr. Daily. 

While working at the house, Kipps is disturbed by many mysterious occurrences, including the sightings of a woman clad in a black dress. However, as he works on the papers in the house, he finds out the secret behind the family who owned the house before and the deaths occurred near the house. The house owners were Alice and Charles Drablow, who lived there with their 7-year-old son. However, their son died because of drowning in an accident in the marshes. The body was never recovered. From the documents in the house, Kipps finds out that there is more in the story of the death and the relationship between the woman in black and the Drablow family.

Meanwhile in the village, child deaths occurred right after the Kipps mysterious sightings of the woman in black. It seems that in the past, there has been many deaths occurring involving the children of the families in the village, including Mr. Daily's son. Those children seems to die in accidental situation, but everybody know that it is not what it looks to be. Little by little, Kipps and Mr. Daily, although he doesn't want to believe it, know that these deaths has everything to do with the woman in black and the hideous history happened in the house before.

Prior to the visit, Kipps has arranged for his son and the nanny to join him in the village. Knowing the story, and the danger that comes with it, Kipps tries to stop them from coming but cannot give them the news. Now, he has to do something to avoid his son from harm. What can he do? Will he succeed? But first of all, what is the story behind the mysterious deaths of the children, and who is The Woman In Black?

In the end, it is rather tragic. However, there is a positive element in the negative outcome. As i would like to conclude, that Kipps is actually doing the woman in black a favour, and the woman in black repays his favour. If you are going to watch this movie, try to see if you will agree with me.

Not bad. And not bad to see Daniel Radcliffe in another suit other than Harry Potter's. Oh, and this movie is actually based on a novel of the same name, authored by Susan Hill and has been adapted in stage plays and television film prior to this movie (source of this statement: wiki).

Saturday, March 3, 2012

life and sudoku



how do you like solving sudoku puzzles?
taking your own sweet time....or challenge yourself with a timer?
how far do you challenge yourself in solving sudoku?
stop at normal sudoku....or upping the ante with the killer ones?
do you steadfastly working on one puzzle until you solve it?
or leave it when it's tough and come back later?
when you feel that you are stranded halfway,
and later when you continue,
do you continue from where you stop....or rub it all off and restart from scratch?

maybe....
by studying the way you treat a sudoku puzzle...
mas o menos,
it will reflect how do you actually treat the issues and problems in your life
don't you think so?